What the hell did they do???

Huge

Holla if you hear me!
Staff member
Anyone see anything wrong with this pic? :mad:

jack.jpg
 

Huge

Holla if you hear me!
Staff member
There used to be an 86 in that picture.

Not only that, it's like comaring new coke to old coke :sick: Please tell me they didn't "change the formula" Something's not right...
 

leslie

New Member
I read about this a bit back. They made the proof lower...cause that is what the "public wanted".

:retard:
 

Huge

Holla if you hear me!
Staff member
ARGH. In the land of low-carb bs, I'm not surprised. Maybe I just got a bad batch (it really tastes syrupy-sweet).
 

Gonzo

Infinitesimally Outrageous
Staff member
That wouldn't be the cola part would it? I can't even fathom syrupy sweet being used for JD.
 

Huge

Holla if you hear me!
Staff member
I'm on flavored seltzer and JD now; still seems sweet. I've only drank 2 kinds of bourbon/whiskey on a continuos basis: JD and Jim Beam. Something is definitely different. :confused:
 

leslie

New Member
I think it's always been 80 proof here...sweet isn't what I'd call it but perhaps they've made a different formula altogether in there.


Maybe this is a lead in to "New JD" and the reintroduction of "Classic JD". You can only hope.
 
Top