{follow all the way thru to the end)
There is unequivocal evidence the President of the United States had warning of the attacks in NY & DC. It was spelled out to him, in detail, by the Phillipino (is that right Toolbox) government. They actually told him it would be Al-Qieda. That binLaden had authorized use of highjacked commercial jetliners to crash into American government buildings. I'm unsure if, at the time, they knew about the WTC towers or an equivalent.
With all this political nonsense happening, like Hillary:
The part that the media is just beginning to talk about is the simple fact that the Senate & House each have a Intelligence Committee that gets EXACTLY the same briefing the President gets, within minutes of his briefing & sometimes sooner.
So, the President has this information. He knows what is going to happen, more or less. He either ignores it, acts hastily & shuts down the airports prematurley or puts a stop to it. He seemed to have ignored blatant warnings. Should we impeach the SOB? Was it the right call? I think he acted exactly right. Now for the punchline. The President that had all this information wasn't Dubya, it was William Jefferson Clinton. He got the info in 1995. Therer'san artilce in Time magazine from about 12/18/95 about it. Put that in your pipe & smoke it Dan Rather.
There is unequivocal evidence the President of the United States had warning of the attacks in NY & DC. It was spelled out to him, in detail, by the Phillipino (is that right Toolbox) government. They actually told him it would be Al-Qieda. That binLaden had authorized use of highjacked commercial jetliners to crash into American government buildings. I'm unsure if, at the time, they knew about the WTC towers or an equivalent.
With all this political nonsense happening, like Hillary:
(although she convienently forgot most of what was needed when we deserved answers from her during Rose-Hill law firm investigation). Also,"Clearly the public demands answers immediately," she told reporters, adding, "The people of New York deserve those answers more than anyone."
. Even the Republicans are looking stup...err, at the Capitol for answers,Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, the majority leader, said he was "gravely concerned" and asked, "Why did it take eight months for us to receive this information?" Mr. Daschle added that the president should immediately hand the Congressional intelligence committees "the entire briefing that he was given" in August.
"I think it should have been acted upon, and it wasn't," said Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the Senate intelligence committee.
The part that the media is just beginning to talk about is the simple fact that the Senate & House each have a Intelligence Committee that gets EXACTLY the same briefing the President gets, within minutes of his briefing & sometimes sooner.
So, the President has this information. He knows what is going to happen, more or less. He either ignores it, acts hastily & shuts down the airports prematurley or puts a stop to it. He seemed to have ignored blatant warnings. Should we impeach the SOB? Was it the right call? I think he acted exactly right. Now for the punchline. The President that had all this information wasn't Dubya, it was William Jefferson Clinton. He got the info in 1995. Therer'san artilce in Time magazine from about 12/18/95 about it. Put that in your pipe & smoke it Dan Rather.