This has always bugged me. Assuming we Americans have culture at all, how is (fill in heritage/race here)culture different from American culture?
I don't mean, how is Japanese culture, for instance, different. I mean, a multiple generation American family from a Japanese heritage. They are American. How is that culture different from an muti-generational American from Ireland family?
Some claim to have (fill in heritage/race here) culture. I can't tell the differnce whether it's a black writer or a white writer. Same with songsmiths. Or painters. How is a Mexican balladeer different from a Czechoslavakian balladeer, assuming they both write in english?
Sub-cultures exist. But isn't the American culture (shut up you French) equal? The content may reflect a heritage but the actual works are done the same aren't they?
I'm not starting a fight with this, just curious if there is really a difference. I can't see one.
I don't mean, how is Japanese culture, for instance, different. I mean, a multiple generation American family from a Japanese heritage. They are American. How is that culture different from an muti-generational American from Ireland family?
Some claim to have (fill in heritage/race here) culture. I can't tell the differnce whether it's a black writer or a white writer. Same with songsmiths. Or painters. How is a Mexican balladeer different from a Czechoslavakian balladeer, assuming they both write in english?
Sub-cultures exist. But isn't the American culture (shut up you French) equal? The content may reflect a heritage but the actual works are done the same aren't they?
I'm not starting a fight with this, just curious if there is really a difference. I can't see one.