Almost 3000 threads...
- Thread starter fury
- Start date
HEY, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING! DON'T KICK A MAN WHEN HE'S DOWN! DON'T HIT A MAN WITH GLASSES! DON'T HIT A MAN WHO'S NOW TAKING A PISS, ESPECIALLY SINCE I COULD HIT YOU IF YOU KICK ME!
NOPE, what MAKES you SAY that? HUH?
i THOUGHT so!
PsychoMark
^ bored.
you thought?
Scary THOUGHT, isn't it? 
I THOUGHT you might say that...
Ah, now you're learning. Soon, you'll be able to come up with your own THOUGHTs. 
Once again, I am writing in response to Mr. Stop T. Laughing's subliminal psywar campaigns, and once again, I merely wish to point out that Mr. Laughing and his comrades are social pariahs and should be ostracized. One of the first facts we should face is that Mr. Laughing will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "laughable" or "unprincipled". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. His intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Mr. Laughing doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. The primary point of disagreement between myself and Mr. Laughing is whether or not today, we might have let him twist the truth. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will protect our peace, privacy, and safety.
Imagine, as it is not hard to do, that it is far too easy for him to use fear, intimidation, sedating substances, and other tools to convince abysmal propagandists (especially the power-drunk type) to exhibit cruelty to animals. He has never tried to stop invidious freebooters who judge people based solely on hearsay. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Mr. Laughing encourages that sort of behavior. There is absolutely nothing these disloyal, raving euphuists will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some malign incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.
So who's crazy? I, or all the dirty psychics who claim that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong? Before you answer, let me point out that even if one is opposed to pestiferous nihilism (and I, not being one of the many complacent desperados of this world, am), then surely, I would never take a job working for him. Given his ghastly warnings, who would want to?
Even though Mr. Laughing gives flattering titles to his natural distempers, I've heard of infernal things like philistinism and exhibitionism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Mr. Laughing's ignorant, unthinking, foolish brain is too small to understand. Even though he insists that racialism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society, I really think that anyone with eyes and a brain can tell that he has no right to be here. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. The unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, people tell me that Mr. Laughing's expositors hew closer to the party line -- to Mr. Laughing's established body of cant -- than do most other unscrupulous treasonous-types. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. Mr. Laughing's true goal is to wipe out delicate ecosystems. All the statements that his understrappers make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to derail Mr. Laughing's villainous little schemes.
In a sense, Mr. Laughing's attempts to create massive civil unrest are much worse than mere incendiarism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. However, I need your help if I'm ever to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most sick manifestations. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. For one thing, heartless isolationism is merely a symptom of the disease called "Mr. Laughing-ism". But more important, it would be more productive for Mr. Laughing to take a more diplomatic and conciliatory approach. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Mr. Laughing tried to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Again, he contends that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Sounds rather dictatorial, doesn't it? Well, that's Mr. Laughing for you.
The hostility and boredom he is experiencing internally is quite evident externally. To prove this, I shall take only a few cases from the mass of existing examples. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. I might be able to forgive Mr. Laughing, but only if he promises never again to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly illaudable. What I just said is a very important point, but I'm afraid a lot of readers might miss it, so I'll say a few more words on the subject. We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we have to arraign him at the tribunal of public opinion.
Please remember that I hate Mr. Laughing to my very bone marrow. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Mr. Laughing finds a way to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. This is particularly interesting when you consider that if he opened his eyes, he'd realize that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, am concerned that his vague and overly broad definition of "historiographical" will cause petty beggars to destroy the heart and fabric of our nation in the coming days.
If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then Mr. Laughing is clearly going to be the first to go. He says he's going to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character one day. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that it has been said that he proclaims at every opportunity that his mission is to muzzle his critics. I, in turn, insist that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst types of gruesome stool pigeons there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Mr. Laughing parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock.
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that he doesn't want us to know about his plans to resort to underhanded tactics. Otherwise, we might do something about that. I recently informed Mr. Laughing that his subalterns trivialize the issue. Mr. Laughing said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Mr. Laughing want to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. I know that I'm emotional now, but I have to wonder where he got the idea that it is my view that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I've never written anything to imply that it is. "Mr. Laughing" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development, I tell him or her to stop "Mr. Laughing-ing".
As another disquieting tidbit, the following must be stated: Like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Given the stolid political rhetoric of our times, it is immature and stupid of Mr. Laughing to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to call for proper disciplinary action against him and his shock troops, and that's why I say that he wants a central organization for his international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other countries -- a haven for the most hate-filled big-mouths you'll ever see and a university for budding irrational, witless vagabonds -- and everyone with half a brain understands that. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Mr. Stop T. Laughing in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.
Imagine, as it is not hard to do, that it is far too easy for him to use fear, intimidation, sedating substances, and other tools to convince abysmal propagandists (especially the power-drunk type) to exhibit cruelty to animals. He has never tried to stop invidious freebooters who judge people based solely on hearsay. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Mr. Laughing encourages that sort of behavior. There is absolutely nothing these disloyal, raving euphuists will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some malign incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.
So who's crazy? I, or all the dirty psychics who claim that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong? Before you answer, let me point out that even if one is opposed to pestiferous nihilism (and I, not being one of the many complacent desperados of this world, am), then surely, I would never take a job working for him. Given his ghastly warnings, who would want to?
Even though Mr. Laughing gives flattering titles to his natural distempers, I've heard of infernal things like philistinism and exhibitionism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Mr. Laughing's ignorant, unthinking, foolish brain is too small to understand. Even though he insists that racialism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society, I really think that anyone with eyes and a brain can tell that he has no right to be here. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. The unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, people tell me that Mr. Laughing's expositors hew closer to the party line -- to Mr. Laughing's established body of cant -- than do most other unscrupulous treasonous-types. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. Mr. Laughing's true goal is to wipe out delicate ecosystems. All the statements that his understrappers make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to derail Mr. Laughing's villainous little schemes.
In a sense, Mr. Laughing's attempts to create massive civil unrest are much worse than mere incendiarism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. However, I need your help if I'm ever to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most sick manifestations. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. For one thing, heartless isolationism is merely a symptom of the disease called "Mr. Laughing-ism". But more important, it would be more productive for Mr. Laughing to take a more diplomatic and conciliatory approach. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Mr. Laughing tried to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Again, he contends that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. Sounds rather dictatorial, doesn't it? Well, that's Mr. Laughing for you.
The hostility and boredom he is experiencing internally is quite evident externally. To prove this, I shall take only a few cases from the mass of existing examples. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. I might be able to forgive Mr. Laughing, but only if he promises never again to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly illaudable. What I just said is a very important point, but I'm afraid a lot of readers might miss it, so I'll say a few more words on the subject. We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we have to arraign him at the tribunal of public opinion.
Please remember that I hate Mr. Laughing to my very bone marrow. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Mr. Laughing finds a way to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. This is particularly interesting when you consider that if he opened his eyes, he'd realize that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, am concerned that his vague and overly broad definition of "historiographical" will cause petty beggars to destroy the heart and fabric of our nation in the coming days.
If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then Mr. Laughing is clearly going to be the first to go. He says he's going to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character one day. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that it has been said that he proclaims at every opportunity that his mission is to muzzle his critics. I, in turn, insist that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst types of gruesome stool pigeons there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Mr. Laughing parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock.
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that he doesn't want us to know about his plans to resort to underhanded tactics. Otherwise, we might do something about that. I recently informed Mr. Laughing that his subalterns trivialize the issue. Mr. Laughing said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Mr. Laughing want to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. I know that I'm emotional now, but I have to wonder where he got the idea that it is my view that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I've never written anything to imply that it is. "Mr. Laughing" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development, I tell him or her to stop "Mr. Laughing-ing".
As another disquieting tidbit, the following must be stated: Like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Given the stolid political rhetoric of our times, it is immature and stupid of Mr. Laughing to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to call for proper disciplinary action against him and his shock troops, and that's why I say that he wants a central organization for his international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other countries -- a haven for the most hate-filled big-mouths you'll ever see and a university for budding irrational, witless vagabonds -- and everyone with half a brain understands that. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Mr. Stop T. Laughing in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.
Wrong personality, fury, er, wbt.
For the Attention of: Mr. Stop Laughing
Mr. Laughing, although I do, from time to time, produce letters of complaint or inquiry of that length, I would like to remind you that there is no relation between the administrator(s) of this message board (defined as a medium of communication between all parties involved in said messageboard) and myself, William B. "Slingblade" Thornton, Attorney at Law.
Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that any letter I produce never exceeds the length necessary to portray the intended message, so considering the fact that the letter in question which was sent by fury has no discernable point to it nor does it make any distinguishable sense, I must ask that I am held completely indemnified and that you agree and understand that said letter has had no influence from myself or anyone else on my team of legal staff whatsoever.
Sincerely,
William B. "Slingblade" Thornton, Attorney at Law.
Disclaimer: This message is copyright © 2002 William B. "Slingblade" Thornton (hereby referred to as "The Author"). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction of this message without prior written consent from "The Author" is illegal and may warrant legal recourse. Names used within this letter were not modified in any way to protect the innocent, as there are no innocent parties in a false accusation other than that of the accused. If you find this message to be offensive to you, please do not read it.
Mr. Laughing, although I do, from time to time, produce letters of complaint or inquiry of that length, I would like to remind you that there is no relation between the administrator(s) of this message board (defined as a medium of communication between all parties involved in said messageboard) and myself, William B. "Slingblade" Thornton, Attorney at Law.
Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that any letter I produce never exceeds the length necessary to portray the intended message, so considering the fact that the letter in question which was sent by fury has no discernable point to it nor does it make any distinguishable sense, I must ask that I am held completely indemnified and that you agree and understand that said letter has had no influence from myself or anyone else on my team of legal staff whatsoever.
Sincerely,
William B. "Slingblade" Thornton, Attorney at Law.
Disclaimer: This message is copyright © 2002 William B. "Slingblade" Thornton (hereby referred to as "The Author"). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction of this message without prior written consent from "The Author" is illegal and may warrant legal recourse. Names used within this letter were not modified in any way to protect the innocent, as there are no innocent parties in a false accusation other than that of the accused. If you find this message to be offensive to you, please do not read it.
Hmm, funny, you write just like fury's last post (which is all crap, speaking of which... 
...ahh), and I call out your name and you suddenly appear. I should summon you more often! Who works for who, huh? 
...ahh), and I call out your name and you suddenly appear. I should summon you more often! Who works for who, huh?
Re: For the Attention of: Mr. Stop Laughing
Done.
wbt said:
Done.
I only appear when I must defend myself and my reputation from becoming clouded due to outrageous accusations that I write letters which are obviously written by a complaint generator and are not authentic material.
You may assume that fury and I are of the same being, however your assumption is far from correct. Fury is not even of the same stature as myself. I write more coherent letters, I ensure that my point is clearly obvious even to the most oblivious of readers, and I do not partake in the posting of the mindless gibberish that fury wishes to encourage himself and others to participate in.
You may assume that fury and I are of the same being, however your assumption is far from correct. Fury is not even of the same stature as myself. I write more coherent letters, I ensure that my point is clearly obvious even to the most oblivious of readers, and I do not partake in the posting of the mindless gibberish that fury wishes to encourage himself and others to participate in.