NFL 2002
- Thread starter Gonzo
- Start date
Week by week matchups are here- http://nfl.com/schedules/ and the team by team schedule can be found from that link too
S
s4
Guest
The thing about the NFL that makes it great is tradition.
unclehobart
this is my special title
I wont bother watching until Bradshaw suits up again.
unclehobart
this is my special title
Is that the same Holmgren who played Hasselbeck over Dilfer when Dilfer never lost? Granted he isn't the best QB, but he's a hell of a lot better than Hasselbeck! 
Dilfer QB rating: 92.0
Hasselbeck QB rating: 70.9
That's a huge difference, Hasselbeck played about twice as much as Dilfer, but Dilfer still got enough time in to show what he can do that obviously Hasselbeck didn't. BTW, they each threw 7 TDs, but again Hasselbeck had twice as much playing time, he should've had more than 14 to warrant him being their #1 QB. Sorry, without a Favre, Holmgren's not a good coach. Favre could make any coach look good, damn him.
Dilfer QB rating: 92.0
Hasselbeck QB rating: 70.9
That's a huge difference, Hasselbeck played about twice as much as Dilfer, but Dilfer still got enough time in to show what he can do that obviously Hasselbeck didn't. BTW, they each threw 7 TDs, but again Hasselbeck had twice as much playing time, he should've had more than 14 to warrant him being their #1 QB. Sorry, without a Favre, Holmgren's not a good coach. Favre could make any coach look good, damn him.
markjs
QuackHead
Thats another reason I think we will make a showing in the NFC west, because Dilfer has been named the starter for 2002. I think Dilfer is one of those guys whos better than his numbers....he is a great leader, and sharp enough of a passer to get it done. Hasselbeck had some raw throwing ability but little else. Another reason is because the one time in the last two years that we played the Rams we nearly beat them, I know neraly isnt good enough but they did not slaughter us like so many teams they play, and they beat us by a slim margin late in the game. I also dont think SF is that great.....they aren't bad, but a soft schedule contributed to last years success and their defense is suspect. Holmgren has had enough time to build a pretty good team and I think most of all that was missing last year was Dilfer or better at QB. Also in recent years, the NFC is much softer than the AFC in general. Look for us to grab a wildcard spot in the playoffs...if I had money Id lay some on it. If we dont Holmgren will be in the unemployment line in 2003.
I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't even make 8-8, the Rams and 49ers are extremely tough competition. However, in the NFL, anything can happen. Look at my Bears for example, I wouldn't have picked them to even make 8-8 last year, let alone win the division and a first round bye in the playoffs. They've got an easy schedule for the first 4 weeks, but then they have the Packers :verymad: on Monday night, followed by their bye, then two easier games followed by 3 straight in November against the Eagles, Patriots, and Rams, ouch. It's pretty average after that, but geez, November will be hell.
It seems the fans voted for the blue helmet.
http://www.seahawks.com/news/index.cfm?source=st&cont_id=104182
http://www.seahawks.com/news/index.cfm?source=st&cont_id=104182